Is what it says right here.
It's labeled "opinion," but it could be "fact." What it's not is "news."
Whatever happened to all of Gableman's bigtime defenders* and supporters, I wonder. Remember, the ones who promised he'd restore "traditionalism" and "restraint" to the Supreme Court. They've been awfully quiet. Whatever methods it took to justify their ends, evidently. Maybe that's who Ed Garvey means by moral eunuchs.
* Apart from the illustrious Mr. James Bopp, that is.