Should the Court, however, determine that it is within this Court's discretion to appoint a three-judge panel, and instruct that panel to accept the redistricting challenges set forth in the (now-withdrawn) Petition or to defer in light of the pending federal action. — Wisconsin Dept. of Justice, Response etc.*What do you call that, a dangling antecedent?
Maybe I need a grammarian and a logician. Or maybe the DoJ does.
* Another panel, the federal court in question, noted that the same author "skirt[ed] the line of being intemperate and unduly combative."
Which is nevertheless preferable to being incomprehensible, imho.