March 28, 2011

More on Big Fitz's Kinko's Amendment

From the estimable MULS professor Edward Fallone.
I do not see my analysis as differing in any significant way from the analysis previously set forth in this [here awesome illusory tenant] blog. — Ed Fallone, prof. of constitutional law
Yess! [/marvalbert]

Incidentally, this blawg was posted Friday evening before the Legislative Reference Bureau — or anybody else — had weighed in.

Just sayin'.

3 comments:

Michael J. Mathias said...

From downtown!

illusory tenant said...

Boom goes the dynofitz.

Paul said...

Can we hope to see any of them in orange jumpsuits? Or do we have to remove them from office before they can be prosecuted?