I wonder, did it ever occur to Whoopi Goldberg that not only is a 13-year-old victim of sexual assault legally incapable of offering consent, but the particular 13-year-old victim of film director Roman Polanski testified to having repeatedly denied consent.
So, yes, in consideration of both of those non-demonstrations of consent it was indeed, as Whoopi Goldberg would say, "rape-rape."
There is no hierarchy of rape and there is no legal dispute over Roman Polanski's self-imposed predicament.* Frankly, it's astonishing that Whoopi Goldberg would even suggest there is a moral one.
* At least, not in the jurisdiction from which he fled prior to sentencing, which is the directly relevant one. Whoopi Goldberg's attempts to raise the broader societal question of age of consent regulations are separate from this case, and immediately fall flat.