Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Rich in Retail. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Rich in Retail. Sort by date Show all posts

May 21, 2011

Rich in Retail is now Rich in State government

Hey, does everybody remember Rich in Retail, Scott Walker's deceitful, eavesdropping, surreptitious recorder-of-putatively-private-bar-time-conversations political campaign communications specialist?

Well! look what the cat dragged in:


Yeah we already know what other stuff you do.

There is your classic Republican tea-glibertarian: Hatin' on the gummint, but lovin' him some sweet, sweet gummint salary and Cadillac benefits.

Time for a little follow-up, Mr. Daniel Bice?

September 20, 2010

Beware the Scott Walker Brady Street moles

Rich is the name, retail sales is the game

Here's an amusing tale from Daniel Bice in the Journal-Sentinel revealing the deceitful shenanigans of one of Scott Walker's political aides who hangs around at bars in downtown Milwaukee, eavesdrops on total strangers' telephone calls, and then strikes up fraudulent conversations of his own, which he surreptitiously records with an i-Thingie.

During which Scott Walker's aide, the notorious Michael Brickman, lies about his name ("Rich"), lies about his occupation ("retail"), and lies that he knows next to nothing of the political campaign with which he's intimately involved (throughout — behold the transcript).

The honest party to the surreptitiously recorded conversation is John-david Morgan, a union activist. Morgan runs an anti-Walker website called Scott Walker Truth Squad dot org. Which is shocking, because everybody loves Scott Walker, especially county employees.

Apart from the Scott Walker aide's underhanded tactics, there's little to Bice's story except for an implied whiff of illegality, which the report concocts by relating Morgan's account of chatting with Phil Walzak at Milwaukee Laborfest. Morgan describes Walzak as "the guy that runs Barrett's campaign." Barrett is Tom Barrett, the mayor of Milwaukee and the Democratic nominee for Wisconsin governor.

Third-party efforts — depending on the nature of the third-party and depending further on the nature of that third-party's efforts — on behalf of a political campaign may be treated as contributions to the campaign, if those efforts are coordinated with the campaign.

But Walzak doesn't run Tom Barrett's campaign; he's one of Barrett's own spokespersons and moreover, flatly denies Mr. Morgan's grandiose perorations. Yet the implied bar-time suggestion was apparently compelling enough for Bice that the reporter contacted two "election law experts," one of whom is quoted as warning,
"If SEIU or any other union spent money based on discussions they had with the Barrett campaign — whatever campaign — yeah, you've got a coordinated expenditure issue," said [George] Dunst, who is now retired from State government.
"The union may, in short, be handcuffed," notes Mr. Bice gravely.

By the same reasoning if SEIU shot a man in Reno just to watch him die, then yeah, you've got a homicide issue. In any event, it would appear the coordination isn't going so well when the putative coordinator doesn't even know who's who with the Barrett campaign.

And while surreptitious bar-time recordings aren't per se unlawful here, I understand they're a bugger to get admitted as evidence in civil cases and this one contains about eleventeen layers of hearsay.

The other election expert cited is Marquette University professor of law Rick Esenberg, who the Journal-Sentinel frequently presents as a disinterested academic. Not exactly. In fact when the O'Donnell parking garage fatality occurred in June, Prof. Esenberg hurried to his computer to announce that any observer that so much as linked to a website whose proprietor simply wondered aloud how the tragedy might affect the ongoing political campaign for governor was a "ghoul." So much for the election law expert's academic disinterest.

In summary, be careful who you're talking to out there, and be vigilant of who's eavesdropping on your private conversations. It could very well be a Scott Walker communications aide (named "Rich" who works in "retail") with a vibrating electronic device in his pants.

September 23, 2010

October 6, 2010

Kleefisch dereligionized, undebatable

"Arrogance ... total disregard for the voters of Wisconsin."
The Walker camp has quickly taken over Kleefisch's scheduling and media relations. Even the "issues" page on Kleefisch's campaign website now links to Walker's website instead of her original content, which incorporated more religious flavoring in her pro-life and marriage-protection stances.
Lt. gov. candidate refuses to debate

"Can we marry dogs? This is ridiculous." — Rebecca Kleefisch

Walker referred calls to media relations specialist Rich in retail.

September 27, 2010

Extensive political electronic meanderings

Scott Walker aides in the news (being a near-daily occurrence):
[Then-Walker aide Darlene] Wink was not paid to do campaign work on county time, [her] lawyer said, and she regularly took county work home so she could get it done there.
Read: Wink was not paid extra. If she was doing campaign work on county time and getting paid for that county time, then obviously she was getting paid for doing campaign work on county time.
A spokesman for Walker's campaign said he was unaware of the criminal probe.
Which one was that, "Rich" in "retail"?

If the district attorney seizes any more computers over there, Scott Walker's going to have to tally up his county budget on an abacus.

Earlier: Extensive political blogging.

When is somebody finally going to put the lid on that bogus thing?

December 8, 2011

White Christian Conservative Males oppressed

"Please be warned, this clip has been rated racist."

Scott Walker sure knows how to pick him some teevee spokesmodels.

Is Rich in Retail still running Governor Walker's PR effort or what.

September 21, 2010

Reince Priebus and all his Minions

Item: WISGOP complains "lobbyist" not actually lobbyist
[Plaintiff] alleges that Satan has on numerous occasions caused plaintiff misery and unwarranted threats, against the will of plaintiff, that Satan has placed deliberate obstacles in his path and has caused plaintiff's downfall. . . .

We note that the plaintiff has failed to include with his complaint the required form of instructions for the United States Marshal for directions as to service of process.
Mayo v. Satan And His Staff

Earlier: Rich is the name, retail sales is the game*

* I hear Rich's joke was so stupid, not even Keith Olbermann got it.

eta: More Michael "Rich" Brickman, "retail" salesman:
[Tom Barrett said] he would fire a campaign staffer who secretly recorded anyone and lied about his identity.
I guess so. Most people would have fired him weeks ago.

Good for Walker, however. Keep that reckless liability on board.