Showing posts sorted by date for query Glenn Grothman. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Glenn Grothman. Sort by relevance Show all posts

June 5, 2012

Glenn Grothman rests the WISGOP voter fraud case

Asked for evidence of "voter fraud" — which both Wisconsin governor Scott Walker and Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus claim accounts for several tens of thousands of ballots in every election in the State, up to 2% of millions — Wisconsin GOP senator Glenn Grothman stated there's a "feeling" out there that there is. Seriously.

He said it on the teevee just last night.

Earlier: Rep. Jim Ott's critical thinking skills quote of the day

November 27, 2011

Glenn Grothman wants to violate the constitution

Grothman pushes for more accountability [sic] on petitions:
Glenn Grothman's bill would require petition gatherers' statement of authenticity to be in the form of an affidavit, acknowledged by an officer authorized to administer oaths, affirm the circulator's identity and state that the circulator appeared before the officer and executed the statement in the officer's presence.
It's debatable whether Republican Senator Grothman's "hamper[ing], restrict[ing] or impair[ing]"* would be legal before the recalls got rolling, but it's almost certainly illegal now that the recalls are underway. There's some real desperation among the WISGOP leadership in the Senate, where Grothman stands to lose his position as assistant majority leader.

Changing the rules during the game, is what Glenn Grothman is up to.

And you don't get to do that. Sorry bub. Eat your peas.

* See Sec. 12, Para. 7.

November 20, 2011

Wisconsin, meet your enemy

"In some way or another, most [local] conservatives, I guess, would have a connection to us," said Michael Grebe.
The Bradley Foundation.

Where Charlie Sykes is an "intellectual." rofl

Funnier still, the Bradley Foundation promotes "competent government," which apparently refers to powerful legislative committees chaired by the likes of Jim Ott, Mary Lazich, Leah Vukmir, and Glenn Grothman.

And their top attorney plays fast and loose with legal terms of art.

Nothing terribly "intellectual" about that either.

September 29, 2011

Glenn Grothman issues jeremiad on Koch stationery

Lena Taylor declared war on Georgia-Pacific by encouraging a boycott of their products. . . . There are some narrow-minded and mean-spirited members of Wisconsin's Totalitarian Left that will do all they can to destroy those who disagree with them.
It would be interesting to know whether Georgia-Pacific — a wholly owned subsidiary of Koch Industries — manufactures the communications paper which the legislature purchases and conducts its business upon.

Or, obviously, whether its TP is GP.

August 8, 2011

Alberta Darling's deliberate indifference to suffering

On Friday the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a 2010 decision of Federal District Court Judge Charles Clevert of the Eastern District of Wisconsin, which found Wis. Stat. § 302.386(5m) to be a violation of the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

The statute banned State funding of therapy for Wisconsin prisoners medically diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder. One of the cosponsors of the original bill banning the treatment (2005 Wisconsin Act 105) was Alberta Darling, the conservative Republican Wisconsin State Senator who faces a highly contentious recall election tomorrow.

Undecided voters — reportedly there are a few out there — take heed.

Darling was joined in this Act of compassionate conservatism by her counterparts Luther Olsen and Robert Cowles, two other Senators who tomorrow face similar fates. Another was our friend Scott Fitzgerald.

The unanimous Seventh Circuit panel was likewise unequivocal.

In affirming the district court, the three panelists wrote that Wisconsin Department of Corrections officials "acted with deliberate indifference in that [the officials] knew of the serious medical need but refused to provide hormone therapy because of Act 105" despite the inmates' "suffer[ing]," which is known to include "severe physical effects such as muscle wasting, high blood pressure, and neurological complications."

At the time Alberta Darling and her conservative Republican colleagues cosponsored the bill, they knew of exactly two inmates among a population of thousands, upon whom the Wisconsin DOC had expended "approximately $2,300 on hormone therapy." Indeed, at trial before the district court in Milwaukee, the DOC testified that "the cost of providing hormone therapy is between $300 and $1,000 per inmate per year."

Meanwhile Scott Fitzgerald can blow twenty-seven grand in a few days.

Additionally, wrote the Seventh Circuit, "[t]he district court concluded that DOC might actually incur greater costs by refusing to provide hormones, since inmates with [Gender Identity Disorder] might require other expensive treatments or enhanced monitoring by prison security."

Thus does this case put the lie not only to so-called compassionate conservatism — "deliberate indifference to serious medical need" — it moreover blows from the water Darling et al's alleged commitment to "fiscal conservatism." Then there are the costs of the appeal, obviously, and another potential appeal to the Seventh Circuit sitting en banc.

Behold your Kulturkampf, citizens, waged by conservative Republicans like Alberta Darling and the other original sponsors of the bill, who also included the usual suspects like Glenn Grothman and several other of our self-advertised Soldiers of Christ. As has been mentioned before at this space, gender — like sexual orientation, in fact — exists on a continuum.

It's a function of the "intelligent design" the culture warriors claim their Creator has imposed on "his" Creation, which Creator's gender and orientation apparently being less indeterminate than these patients'.

The supernatural is more familiar to them than the observable reality.

Here is the Seventh Circuit's decision: Fields v. Smith. Read the whole thing; it's only 19 pages. And pay particular attention to the medical testimony. Personally I don't care whether or not these folks are prison inmates, which is most evidently the status that raised the intuitive ire of our brave Republican lawgivers. That Alberta Darling and her pals in the Wisconsin legislature literally forced the denial of medical treatment to legitimate sufferers is a disgrace, but especially because of this here:
The [DOC] doctors testified that they could think of no other state law or policy, besides Act 105, that prohibits prison doctors from providing inmates with medically necessary treatment.
Only in Wisconsin, and thanks to State Senator Alberta Darling.

You can help return her to her secluded River Hills mansion tomorrow.

August 5, 2011

Alberta Darling: Wrong on the boner pills

Electile dysfunction.

Chris Liebenthal is documenting Alberta Darling's bad week(s):
Wisconsin Senate Republican Alberta Darling "misspoke" regarding the timing of her departure from the Board of Directors of Planned Parenthood. Darling had claimed she left the board before she was elected to the State Assembly in 1990. Turns out that she was there for a full five years after being elected.
D'oh!

And it must be noted again that the WISGOP is so desperate to hang on to Alberta Darling's 8th District Senate seat that it's shifted all of its southern liberal enclaves into an adjacent district, where Senator Lena Taylor presides over a Democratic lock, and pushed its northern borders further deeper into Glenn Grothman-land. That is, if Democratic challenger Rep. Sandy Pasch topples Alberta Darling on Tuesday, it will be exceedingly difficult for Pasch to defend her incumbency in 2012.

Furthermore it wouldn't surprise me in the least — and I have heard this concern voiced by more than a couple of voters — if the WISGOP means to discourage electoral participation by those southernmost Democrats because if Pasch does win on Tuesday, she won't even be those voters' representative in the Senate once the redistricting plan takes effect.

The WISGOP being nothing if not endlessly devious and power-Viagra'd.

It would be just one additional WISGOP voter suppression technique.

July 16, 2011

Wisconsin Recalls: Lawsuits threatened

Sen. Jim Holperin, Democrat of Eagle River, is threatened with a copyright infringement action by Watchmen Broadcasting of Atlanta. Watchmen is a Christian teevee outfit headed up by Dorothy Spaulding, to whom Jesus Christ Himself awarded the broadcasting license in 1995.

Spaulding alleges Holperin unlawfully used footage of an interview with Kim Simac, one of the Republican challengers to Holperin's incumbency. We took a gander at that interview here. Its nature likely precludes a fair use/parody defense, as the original is already sort of a parody.

I haven't seen — nor heard — the Holperin ad in question but I don't believe there's anything particularly actionable about one candidate for public office using another candidate for public office's own words in support of the former candidate's criticisms of the latter.

In this case, however, it's a third party's material that's allegedly been hijacked. But given the nature and brevity of political ads generally, it's unlikely there would be much to Watchmen Broadcasting's complaint.

All publishers assume the risk, so to speak, of fair use by others.

Holperin was the object of a frivolous lawsuit once before.

Incidentally and on the other hand, one practice which may well be actionable is that of bloggers who capture video segments produced by commercial teevee stations, edit the segments into shorter clips, upload the clips to their own YouTube accounts, and then hotlink to the YouTube account at their blogs. That's out-and-out theft, in my view.

If I was the teevee station I'd go after 'em for sure.

The other prospective legal action issues from David VanderLeest, the Republican challenging Democratic incumbent Senator Dave Hansen. Its text is available here. VanderLeest's counsel is making some nebulous claims against a blogger who has been riding VanderLeest pretty hard.
Use of and transmittal in any form of other than public information will be met with an immediate response in the form of a cause of action if grounded on a solid legal foundation.
Well, anybody can say that. The solid legal foundation is the tricky part.

Personally I'm unconvinced of the utility of digging so deeply into VanderLeest's obviously troubled personal relationships, in particular where it involves his children, because he probably doesn't stand a chance against Hansen anyway, his campaign having raised all of $2K.

But I still find it remarkable that Governor Scott Walker, who labored to keep the white supremacist David Duke off the Republican ballot in 1992, would appear by his continuing silence on the matter to be untroubled by VanderLeest's presence on the Republican ballot Tuesday.

Furthermore, reports the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald "is focused on looming recall elections for nine State senators," one of which involves VanderLeest.

VanderLeest, at minimum, is a troubling dude. Fitz has got to be conflicted over aiding and welcoming him into the WISGOP caucus.

On the other hand, they've already got Sen. Glenn Grothman and they made him the second-in-command of that august upper chamber.

So you never know with this gang.

July 8, 2011

Your Scott Walker supporters in the news

One pleads guilty to two felonies* and another attempts to kill his wife with a hammer. Charles McNeer also contributed to the campaigns of Glenn Grothman, J.B. Van Hollen, Annette Ziegler, and Randy Koschnick.

Those are among the furthest right "family values" crowd in the State.

* Fortunately Gardner hired one of the smartest lawyers in Wisconsin.

June 12, 2011

Appalled Glenn Grothman is appalled

Dept. of Selective Fauxtrage
"I think there is a class of people who lives to get a disorderly conduct ticket. It is a badge of honor of certain leftists in Madison, and they do disrupt things," Glenn Grothman said.
Boo hoo. I'll be impressed when Grothman is appalled by his WISGOP colleagues — including the Republican governor and top Republican legislative leaders — who broke the law and violated the constitution.

May 25, 2011

Occupation Wisconsin: This was a lot of fun

#WIUnion panel, UW Madison Union South 11.12.11
I'm trying to remember the joke Sen. Larson told me at 40:25.

0:12:50 — Sen. Chris Larson
0:22:05 — Melissa Ryan
0:33:35 — Emily Mills
0:45:15 — Chris Liebenthal
0:55:25 — Max Love
0:32:35 — Obligatory Glenn Grothman joke
1:08:50 — WTMJ's Hip Musings, a dramatic recitation

May 23, 2011

State Sen. Glenn Grothman on life as a gay teen

I notice the New York Times is soliciting personal stories about life as a gay teen. Wisconsin State Senator Glenn Grothman has one:
"Did people even know what homosexuality was in high school in 1975? I don't remember any discussion about that at the time. There were a few guys who would make fun of a few effeminate boys," he said, "but that's a different thing than homosexuality."
Grothman is among the most powerful WISGOPers in the legislature: It's like a nightmare, but without the being chased (by a gay homosexual).
Children are more commonly chased by some fantasy figure.
That would be Glenn Grothman's sleeping and waking nightmare.

May 14, 2011

Mike Huebsch's original damages estimate

Finally tracked this back down, which I'd seen ages ago but had forgotten where it was: It's right here. Big ups to @matt_t1.
Condition assessment, recommendations, and cost estimate for work: $500,000.00
Restoration Work
$6,000,000.00 INTERIOR*
$1,000,000.00 EXTERIOR
* Does NOT include any carpet replacement.
Latest bid came in at $112K, so first bid probably didn't get the job.

And apparently NO carpet required replacement.

Meanwhile the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel threw up another Capitol damages story late Friday night, which is much harder to find right now than the initial screaming "Capitol security costs pass $7.8 million" top-of-the-index-page headline was. Reports the MJS:
The recent huge protests at the Capitol did an estimated $270,000 in wear and tear to the building — less than 4% of an early damage estimate given by Gov. Scott Walker's administration.
Well, no, because the $269,550* includes $108,500 for "exterior repair," $3,100 for "ongoing repairs," $30,500 for "custodial services," $1,900 for "photography," and $13,800 for the "assessment," leaving $111,750 in "wear and tear to the building."

So it's actually 0.018625% of the early damage estimate.

Apples to apples, people. Shrubs are neither part of the building nor the building's interior, unless you count GOP Sen. Glenn Grothman.

But constructors had him condemned and sold off for scrap years ago.

* Some of the interior damage is actually attributed to people in wheelchairs, if you can believe that. No winning "optics" in there.

May 5, 2011

Wis. voters required to show photo of Jeff Stone

Good friend of the blog Emily Mills on the WISGOP's voter ID bill.

Everybody knows the Republicans' bill is most likely to discourage from voting those classes of persons who are most likely to vote Democrat. Even Wisconsin's Louie Gohmert, Senator Glenn Grothman of Washington County, copped to this empirical fact yesterday.

Personally, I didn't watch any of the hearings, but my most reliable sources tell me the bill's sponsors, Republicans Jeff Stone and Don Pridemore, were utterly clueless in the face of questioning and were reduced to offering up personal anecdotes from their college days.

Indiana passed a similar bill, which was challenged and went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided in favor of the constitutionality of the photo ID requirement in the case of Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd., which lead opinion has the added Republican bonus of having been authored by the liberal avatar Justice John Paul Stevens.

Now I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I reckon any and all concerns leveled at Messrs. Stone and Pridemore are addressed in that set of opinions, and even more so among the numerous Friends of the Court briefs filed on behalf of the photo ID bill's supporters, all of which documents are freely available on the internets these days.*

Reportedly Jeff 'Get me the least expensive black guy' Stone mentioned the case, but it was quickly made apparent he hadn't even gotten past the syllabus: Preparation with an H for hilarious.

These are your lawmakers, Wisconsin.

* I mean, you don't even have to hump it down to the law library and reconnoiter the latest-fangled digital reader of microfiches.

April 26, 2011

Glenn Grothman vs. the Atheistic Socialists

This character is a parody of a conservative . . . please? (.pdf)

And here's Wis. Sen. Glenn Grothman telling the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that education "can have harmful psychological effects."

Sen. Grothman himself has a law degree [!] so maybe he's correct, although Grothman's attendance at the University of Wisconsin law school apparently predated the tenure of top blogger/law perfesser Ann Althouse, thus mitigating the harmful psychological effects.

For years Grothman has served the good people of Washington County, where his many admirers compare him favorably to Louie Gohmert, and his detractors disfavorably to a block of softwood.

April 16, 2011

More out-of-State agitators in Madison

Well, that was fun.

A member of the editorial board of a leading East Coast media elite newspaper came to Wisconsin to tell it how to run its elections, and Andrew Breitblart of Los Angeles, California repeatedly yelled at Wisconsinites to "Go to Hell." Also a lady from Alaska in leather boots and a bump-it screeched something about abortion and Obama also.*

And baldly lied about a "rent-a-mob trashing your Capitol."

I hope every television station in the State replays Andrew Breitblart's "Go to Hell" ranting. It tells you about everything you need to know.

Another of the vagabond nincompoops was from such jetlagged parts unknown that he wound up his abusive soliloquy with a rousing, "Thank you! And good night!" I checked my watch: It was 1:26 p.m.

As for local talent, my friend Capper informs me that WPRI "senior fellow" Christian Schneider complained that the hip musings of James T. "Hip Musings" Harris, who is an internet troll in the employ of Journal Communications, Inc., were drowned out by cowbells, which goes to show you that when given a choice between two species of cacophony, Real Wisconsinites™ have the most impeccable taste.

Even our Republican elected officials were too ashamed to present themselves alongside this dais laden with inchoate, raging hominids.

Not even Glenn Grothman! Now that's saying something.

* One may only speculate as to the genesis of this fish-clubbing** madwoman's amygdalar gesticulations, but apparently one Barack H. Obama, then a State legislator in Springfield, IL, was wary of provisions in a bill being DOA under the governor's pen by dint of the United States Supreme Court's holding in Stenberg v. Carhart.

** Reportedly in a scene from Palin's "reality" teevee series, the half-term governor advises her daughter to beat the living bejeezus out of a cod as a means of assuaging her psychological frustrations.

Or else of vicariously assuaging Palin mère's. Who the hell knows.

April 11, 2011

Westlaw's missing La Follette v. Stitt headnote

The court held it lacked constitutional authority to intermeddle in the procedural affairs of the legislature after the Republican LGBT caucus went dancing at La Cage and forgot to invite Glenn Grothman along.

(It's funny 'cause it's not an unreasonably inaccurate metaphor.)

April 7, 2011

Wisconsin's GOP counties love Kloppenburg

Because #wiunion GTFOTV State-wide, is why

Contrary to Governor Scott K. Walker's absurdist claim that 'Wisconsin is divided between Madison and the rest of the State,'* Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg posted some of her biggest advances in Republican strongholds during the Supreme Court election on Tuesday. Walker also denies the election had anything to do with his disastrous legislative projects, which have attracted more civil lawsuits than a Chevrolet Corvair at a McDonald's drive-thru.

Meanwhile others among the more imaginative of the nut-right are attempting to forward the claim that incumbent Supreme Court Justice David Prosser was the victim of poor voter turnout in Republican-dominated counties. (They're also making utterly baseless charges of "voter fraud,"** but the Brawler can handle those.)

Then there's a bizarre item in the lefty Capital Times of all places, the less said about the better. T'aint no big deal, the piece's sources therewith assert, that the Fitz Van Walker administration just handed the Supreme Court to an army of motivated punks, thugs, slobs, and hippies,*** a spectacular political failure for the ages.

Those speluncean zanies

The only explanation I can come up with is that a feature expedition article for Spelunker's Quarterly made its way over to the Capital Times, in which local GOP mandarin Mark Jefferson spun so hard and drilled so far into Earth's crust he ran right into UW professor Howard Schweber down amongst the deepest strata of psychological denial.

It's funny because not too long ago, the local conservative intelligentsia, Journal Communications, Inc. products Charlie Sykes, Patrick McIlheran, and Rick Esenberg, were telling anybody within fearshot that incumbent Justice David Prosser would cake-walk back onto his politically conservative high chair, and so thoroughly convincing was his 55-point majority in the winter primary.

It might be recalled that on February 15, Scott Walker was just getting underway with his various assaults on the Wisconsin constitution and on the duly enacted laws of the State. In fact this space predicted that liberal success in the Supreme Court would be contingent on the degree Walker and his fellow desperadoes were inclined to test the patience of the good people of the Badger State.

Turns out them desperadoes was pretty darned inclined.
[Search this blog: CAPITOL KAOS]

The February 15, 2011 primary

Prosser won the February 15 primary against three opponents: Kloppenburg, Assistant State Public Defender Marla Stephens, and Madison attorney Joel Winnig. In terms of political disposition, I don't believe there was anything to choose among the three candidates.

(This space had also recommended JoAnne Kloppenburg as the most politically viable to go against Prosser, as the wing-nut sleaze machine would have made mince meat out of Atty. Stephens, who has devoted her career to enforcing the Bill of Rights, and that is an unpardonable offense to conservatives, as we well learned in 2008.)

Indeed, Atty. Stephens almost immediately threw her wholehearted support behind Atty. Kloppenburg. As far as I know Atty. Winnig retreated to the shadows and endorsed no candidate. Nevertheless, it seems to me sound reasoning to treat the trio's primary vote in the aggregate. And thus did Justice Prosser win the State, 55-45.

And so did Kloppenburg and her energetic supporters have their work set to that gap-closing, and they did indeed succeed in clawing back Prosser's margin. How they did it is as plain as the Arabic numerals.

Gotcher numbers right cheer

Kloppenburg pulled off the biggest flip in Milwaukee Co., which went 54-46 to Prosser in the primary — about the same as his Statewide figures — to 57-43 in favor of Kloppenburg. She couldn't have won the election without turning that margin in particular. But on account of a disappointing turnout in Milwaukee and the slender overall margin of Kloppenburg's victory, she clearly couldn't have won on that accomplishment alone, and that is where the predominantly Republican territories throughout the State came to her rescue.

Since the February primary, Kloppenburg gained in 22 of the State's 24 largest counties, only dropping a couple points in Marathon Co., which went from 51-49 Prosser to 54-46, and Sheboygan Co., where Prosser profited by one, closing out Tuesday with a 63-37 romp.

More impressively, Kloppenburg added eight, five, and nine points respectively amongst the State's three most notorious**** Republican county-enclave-bunkers: Waukesha (3),***** Washington (7), and Ozaukee (14). In addition the AAG picked up six points in Racine Co. (5), ten in Jefferson Co. (18), 11 in Fond Du Lac Co. (16), and a startling 14 points in Winnebago Co. (8), where Kloppenburg choppenburg'd Prosser's margin from 66-34 in February to 52-48.

Kloppenburg Republicans FTW: WMC, AFP, WTF, LOL

Other of the more populous Justice Prosser-won counties where JoAnne Kloppenburg produced significant headway were: Dodge (19), 11 points.; Outagamie (6), 11 points.; Kenosha (12), nine points; Walworth (17), four points; and Wood (22), three points.

That is, all over the State, not just in Madison, and especially in counties otherwise heavily dominated by Republican voters.

So anybody who you catch peddling Republican Governor Scott Walker's terrified apologetica is handing you a phony bill of goods which must be rejected outright. When that guy tweets "Mmm. Burgers" or "O hai Scotty here look a sandwich kthxbai," the implied relaxation is a façade, 'cause there's a hellhound on your trail.

* "The 'backlash' is largely a Dane County phenomenon," rejoins Marquette professor of law and local right-wing media celebrity Rick Esenberg — who apparently never wearies of being almost irretrievably incorrect — and claims, without a scintilla of evidence, that "the Kloppenburg margin is driven almost entirely by votes in a county [Dane] that had become an ideological fever swamp ... "

Sidesplitting stuff, and just so, so wrong. And the guy has been on the radio and the teevee and the op-ed pages and the internets trafficking this and related nonsense nearly continuously lately.

It shocks the conscience, truly.

** Issuing from — who else — the medium wave jackanapes C. Sykes in tandem with the ludicrous Wall Street Journal pundit J. Fund.

*** Those aren't my epithets, those are actual conservative Republican epithets, perhaps most famously "slobs," which was coined by Assistant Majority Senate Leader Glenn Grothman, the Louie Gohmert of Wisconsin politics. However the author uses them here (just in case it wasn't obvious) as terms of endearment.

**** The three were the only three counties not swept by Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson in the last State Supreme Court election of April, 2009, and proving once and for all, as the wing-nut never tires of not telling you, that Wisconsin absolutely will not abide a liberal judge.

***** The figures in parentheses represent the rank, by all 72 Wisconsin counties, in number of total votes cast on Tues., April 5.

February 10, 2011

Charlie Sykes: Justice Prosser is a political phony

"Follow the logic."— Ancient WISGOP saying
Stephens has gone out of her way to define herself as the "open-minded" candidate . . . Her self-proclaimed "open mind" and "unbiased" approach ring hollow when viewed in the larger context of her actions. — Thus sayeth "a new group in town"
Here's our medium wave squawker calling Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Marla Stephens "a political phony" because "a new group in town" has brought some really serious charges of hypocrisy! "Good catch," enthuses the local wing-nut "blogfather." Let's examine the record, before the EPA adds Sykes to its schedule of air pollutants.*

Hypocrisy, Count I:
Stephens released the names of thirteen former and current state legislators who have endorsed her campaign. All are Democrats including Joe Wineke, former Chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party.
It's a pity neither Charlie Sykes nor his "new group in town" checked Justice David Prosser's own website, which lists endorsements from dozens (75 to be exact) of elected officials. Every single one of them is a Republican (including some real dandies, like Glenn Grothman).

Plus two former executive branch officials — one is the ridiculously partisan operative Margaret Farrow — both of whom are Republicans.

Verdict: Prosser FTW.

Hypocrisy, Count II:
Since 1999, Stephens has contributed $2,875 to Wisconsin political campaigns. All of Stephens' contributions have been to Democratic and liberal candidates.
In fact only $1,725 of that, in increments no larger than $100, was to candidates running for partisan offices. Meanwhile Justice Prosser was donating $3,150 to "Republican and conservative candidates."**

Verdict: Prosser FTW.

Hypocrisy, Count III:
She describes herself as "a member of the Democratic party, on and off, throughout [her] life."
She did say that, but she wasn't "describing herself" as such, she was responding to Frederica Freyberg's direct question, "What is your [political affiliation]." That phony hypocrite! — answering truthfully.

Yet only days later, Justice Prosser told the same interviewer:
Well, let me say this. I have the most partisan background of any member of the court.
And indeed Justice Prosser was positively advancing this self-description of his own volition, as his averment was in response to Ms. Freyberg's inquiry, "What is your judicial philosophy."

What he meant was he was not only a member of the Republican Party, he was a Republican legislator in the Wisconsin State Assembly for 18 years, including six as minority leader and two as speaker.

Moreover, exactly as fits Charlie Sykes & Co.'s groundless allegations of "political phoniness" and hypocrisy against Atty. Stephens, Justice Prosser went on to disassociate himself from those former political affiliations for the purposes of fair and impartial judging.

And rightly so, to the equal credit of both candidates.

Therefore those affirmations of impartiality made by both Justice Prosser and Atty. Stephens are identical, the only difference being Prosser having raised the issue without being urged to do so.

"Gone out of his way," to coin a phrase.

Verdict: Prosser FTW.

Finally:
Media Trackers is a Wisconsin-based organization dedicated to media accountability, government transparency, and quality fact-based journalism.
Not quite. Rather, this "new group in town" is dedicated to laughable, painfully amateurish drek. Which is right up Charlie Sykes's alley.

It's abundantly clear who's pushing the dishonesty around here.

* a.k.a. the Fairness Doctrine.

** He also gave $500 to Shirley Abrahamson, which anybody who witnessed his fingerpointing mini-tirade toward the Chief Justice at last week's open administrative hearing might imagine he regrets.

Three more contributions totaling $650 were dispensed throughout 1997 and 1998 to former Republican Governor Tommy Thompson. Thompson appointed Prosser to the Supreme Court in late 1998.

The source for these figures is the same one as Sykes's "good catch."

July 31, 2010

Glenn Grothman, speaking for himself

"There are tens of thousands of people with master's degrees who don't have the common sense God gave a rabbit,"* said State Sen. Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend), who has a law degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
"Democrats will turn America into a country like Africa."
Tom Barrett declined an interview request on the issue.
Now that is smart.

* An odd choice for GG, given their notorious sexual promiscuity.

July 28, 2010