Fallone's piece is titled "The Constitutional Challenge to Act 10 is Serious" and his main contention is that there is nothing unprecedented or unusual about the ruling. He cites Judges Sumi and Conley, who earlier ruled in whole or in part against SB 10, and judges from other jurisdictions with similar rulings over many years.
My takeaway is that this bill is going to have a rocky time in courtrooms in the near future. I give it four years before being killed or hobbled.
Fallone had a nice piece as well
ReplyDeletehttp://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2012/09/16/the-constitutional-challenge-to-act-10-is-serious/
Fallone's piece is titled "The Constitutional Challenge to Act 10 is Serious" and his main contention is that there is nothing unprecedented or unusual about the ruling. He cites Judges Sumi and Conley, who earlier ruled in whole or in part against SB 10, and judges from other jurisdictions with similar rulings over many years.
ReplyDeleteMy takeaway is that this bill is going to have a rocky time in courtrooms in the near future. I give it four years before being killed or hobbled.
hey, brew city - when are you going to have something on your blog again?
ReplyDeleteYeah no shit.
ReplyDeleteCorporations are people, my friend.
ReplyDelete