Of the single loss they did sustain:
“Unfortunately a portion of it was fraud,” Robin Vos said.And unfortunately for Robin Vos, fraud requires intent, which must be proven, and Robin Vos hasn't proven it, so he's simply lying about it.
"I still think that in many ways the election was illegitimate," he said. "To have a recall where someone is going to be serving for the next two years but use the old district lines seems like kind of a rigged setup.Which is funny, because that is how Robin Vos's party wrote and passed the law, so that the new districts wouldn't take effect until November.
No wonder that dude poured a beer on this clown's head.
It's almost the appropriate reply to his nonsense.
4 comments:
"...someone is going to be serving for the next two years but use the old district lines seems like kind of a rigged setup."
R.V. conveniently overlooks the fact that even without the recall, Van Waanker would have been serving the same Kenosha county residents who had no voice in his election in 2010 (and have lost their opportunity to vote in this year's regular election).
" "To have a recall where someone is going to be serving for the next two years but use the old district lines seems like kind of a rigged setup."
Mr. Vos, You have your party-mates, more importantly, yourself to blame for that. The recall AND the rigged set-up that you created.
Vos: "I still think that in many ways the election was illegitimate,..."
So do I. Are we sure that Walker one? Between fake Democrats in the primaries, robocalls telling recall petition signers not to vote and the switch out of optical scan machines for touch screen machines in the months before the recall, I have reasons to question the outcome too.
How anyone votes for this guy, I will never understand.
Post a Comment