Actually I don't have such a big problem with Laurie McCallum's construction of the law as many on "my side" do. Dissenting opinions are always of some value. I just think that this would be a better world to live in if Scott Walker wasn't appointing anyone to anything.
Also, I think this line from the initial Wisconsin Gazette story is extremely misleading: "But McCallum, the politically connected wife of former GOP Gov. Scott McCallum, defied nearly 30 years of precedent in state law by asserting that sexual 'preference,' as she put it, is not a protected category in workplace discrimination cases."
The preference bit isn't "as she put it," it's how the law puts it.
Or "Walker Whine No. 3,945,284"
ReplyDeleteActually I don't have such a big problem with Laurie McCallum's construction of the law as many on "my side" do. Dissenting opinions are always of some value. I just think that this would be a better world to live in if Scott Walker wasn't appointing anyone to anything.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I think this line from the initial Wisconsin Gazette story is extremely misleading: "But McCallum, the politically connected wife of former GOP Gov. Scott McCallum, defied nearly 30 years of precedent in state law by asserting that sexual 'preference,' as she put it, is not a protected category in workplace discrimination cases."
ReplyDeleteThe preference bit isn't "as she put it," it's how the law puts it.
See? I'm a fair guy.