Newsflash: Bill Lueders got tooled. And illusory tenant is - allegedly - his willing bitch.What an internets honor.
Yet Lueders was vindicated and his detractors look the fools.
(And I am hardly Bill Lueders's bitch, for the record.)
August 27, 2011
Trollicane Meade makes blogfall
Yet Lueders was vindicated and his detractors look the fools.
(And I am hardly Bill Lueders's bitch, for the record.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
"Ron Blair likes to intimidate people. He is teretorial. Meade stood up to him. Bravo Sir Meade."
Meade is nobody's bitch.
What a pest.
Speaking of nobody's b****, this is nice from the details about the meeting of the justices, post incident and how Gaybleman handles staff: "Justice Gableman then addressed [court staffer Margaret] asking her if she was taking notes . Margaret felt as though Justice Gableman addressed her in an intimidating manner; questioning why she was writing."
That's consistent with Gableman's performances at the court's open administrative hearings.
Prosser also said Abrahamson uses the HR staff to intimidate him. And both he and Teh Gabe insinuate the librul womens' relationship is more than professional nudge nudge.
Strange cats, these GOP manly men.
Page 64 of 70: "Justice Gableman believes Justice Bradley is a little bit taller than Justice Prosser...he believed Justice
Bradley was leaning over Justice Prosser." Egads, I believe that what Gaybleman believes is not to be believed, if that can be believed.
Ok, from page 65 of the reports, what Gaybleman "believes" has gone from ludicrous to sublime--he must be instructed by Bopp on using that word, so he can just change his statement, because "Justice Gableman believed Justice Prosser's palms
were...never over her shoulder or around her neck at
any point. Justice Gableman did not believe Justice Prosser made contact with Justice
Bradley's neck at any point" is so obviously not what others said.
Yep, Prosser's own admission contradicts Gableman's testimony.
Incidentally there is a growing body of social science literature pointing to the unreliability of eyewitness testimony which in turn is being absorbed by the legal literature and indeed decisions of the courts. Gableman made a special point of mocking Louis Butler's use of social science research:
"[I]n addition to all these longstanding case precedents [Butler] cited, I remember reading one case where he cited The Wizard of Oz and based decisions on social science studies that were manufactured at colleges and universities."
Amusing now that Gableman has helped to confirm the skeptical view of eyewitness testimony.
Ok, Gableman demands notes from a court staffer, but is himself above the law (or is it that he IS the law?), page 66: "Justice Gableman recalled Margaret Brady taking notes during this meeting. He asked Margaret what the notes were for. He remembers Margaret responding by saying she always takes notes in meetings like this and he asked for a copy of
those notes. Margaret said that the notes were her personal notes and refused to give him a copy of them. We asked Justice Gableman if he had taken notes on
this incident as well and he stated that he had written notes down on his computer as well as on paper. Justice Gableman said that he was not going to give us his notes that he had put in his computer, but he would allow us to
review his notes that he wrote on paper."
Probably been a long time since anybody asked to use his notes--maybe since he was a 1L and unwary classmates found out they contained gems like, "Con law is boring. Wonder if I can lie and get away with it?"
Then there is Justice Ziegler, who admits she wasn't watching the Prosser/Bradley engagement, being otherwise in conversation with the CJ, yet Ziegler can confirm to investigators what the said engagement did not involve. Odd claims for former trial judges.
Post a Comment