June 15, 2011

Adventures in original jurisdiction "with teeth"


@FakeProsser

20 comments:

  1. Perfect compliment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And never was a vacation more perfectly timed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Will there be a blog post forthcoming outlying specifically if and how the Supreme Court ruling was a case of judicial activism? Or was it a case where truly Judge Sumi overstepped her bounds?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This isn't judicial activism, this is judicial arrogance.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What's interesting is that now the Legislature is going to need to scramble to add amendments to the budget exempting, say, transit workers from the provisions of AB 10 so as not to run afoul of federal requirements to receive transit funds. And probably a few other "constitutional issues" as per Walker's own statements.

    Nicely coordinated, guys.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, I'd like to thank you for all the effort put into translating for laypeople like me.

    Unfortunately, I now have a pretty good grasp of just how much was chucked over the side - not the least of which was the reputation of a damn fine judge - to keep SSBS FitzWalker off the shoals. And it's depressing as hell.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Depressing in a sense but it's got to be energizing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How can it be energizing when seemingly a majority of Wisconsinites have no freaking clue about how the law is suppose to operate???

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's a separate and ongoing source of general malaise.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It does heighten the contradictions. The damage these yokels are doing to political norms with their increasing shamelessness will be difficult to mend, though.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah, I didn't have anything else to do for the next fifteen-twenty years, what with the worldwide depression and all.

    ReplyDelete
  12. What kind of status does this decision have as precedent, as opposed to an appeal?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for your blog. I have to go now. I have to make Senate Senator Robert Cowles lose his elected position to Nancy Nusbaum. Door-to-door I go...

    ReplyDelete
  14. What kind of status does this decision have as precedent ...

    Considerable. The OML is effectively unconstitutional.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The OML is effectively unconstitutional.

    I wonder if that wasn't the result they were going for when they just happened to neglect to wait the full two hours required by law.

    This crap isn't going to stop with just this one bill. They're going to do more, and a lot worse, that they probably don't want the public to take too much notice of. If they can get the OML effectively rescinded, then they have an excuse for cloaking their next deliberations in complete secrecy.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Still haven't seen any reasoned argument that she isn't a "bitch". By your account Prosser would be guilty of calling water "wet".

    ReplyDelete
  17. Never was this fake Tweet ever more prescient.

    http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/2011/06/25/prosser-allegedly-grabbed-fellow-justice-by-the-neck/

    ReplyDelete