September 25, 2010

Why isn't Daniel Foster evolving into a non-moron?

Because he writes for the National Review Online.

h/t Zach Dubbya.

[Avoid inflammatory terms like "moron." Rather, strive for moderation and gentility like Ed Whelan and John Derbyshire — ed.]
@

3 comments:

  1. illusory tenant4:14 PM, September 25, 2010

    Figures.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Clutch8:09 PM, September 25, 2010

    I like the way DF and JW both leave it an open question. Because, hey, isn't that really more honest than admitting that they are sliming Feingold with an obvious falsehood?

    ReplyDelete
  3. illusory tenant8:16 PM, September 25, 2010

    JW is only marginally literate.

    ReplyDelete