There is substantial legal precedent about the teaching of the Christian belief of creation (not going into the other beliefs of creation that Peterson ignored) that make Peterson’s entire column a massive moot point.That's quite the massive blanket assertion. Someone has already asked for that "substantial legal precedent." Good luck finding any.
eta: Nearly 30 comments later, and not the slightest whiff of "substantial legal precedent." Does this guy seriously write a newspaper column? Come to think of it, we have Patrick McIlheran, so it wouldn't come as much of a surprise.