It was a small, tailed, probably tree-climbing, and now extinct primate — from a kind created on Day 6 of Creation Week.Quite underwhelming, and more consistent with Noah's Fludd
— Ken Ham
It's obvious who the real skeptics are.
It was a small, tailed, probably tree-climbing, and now extinct primate — from a kind created on Day 6 of Creation Week.Quite underwhelming, and more consistent with Noah's Fludd
1 comment:
"Evolutionists only open up about the lack of fossil missing links once a new one is found. [...] while Attenborough commented that the missing link “is no longer missing.” So are they admitting the evidence was missing until now (supposedly)?"
Wow, those sneaky evolutionists... first trying to hide the one gap, never admitting something was not in the gap, then making two gaps and trying to hide those!
I bet they have fossils that fits the two new gaps but they're hiding those, too, because they don't fit their so-called "theory" and aren't real transitional forms.
If they would just interpret fossils correctly, they'd realize that any fossilized flood event is The Flood event.
Post a Comment