January 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Archiv
-
▼
2008
(880)
-
▼
January
(45)
- Where are all the brain fossils?
- WMC to restrict WJCIC speech restrictions
- John McCain said a bad, bad thing
- By how much can you miss a point
- A Gableman moment
- A pox on WisPolitics.com
- Butler / Gableman call-in
- Metro temperatures, IQ to plummet
- Loophole hooey and the WJCIC
- W. A. Mozart
- Screen cap funnies I
- Fruit of the poisoned mind
- No Person except a natural born Millionaire
- Suhr takes another Knapp
- Louis Butler: Menace to the Homeland
- Calling Dr. Moe, Dr. Larry, Dr. Gibbs
- Race and gender on MLK Day
- How the others must see the faker
- Joe Ratzinger's orbiter dictum
- Treading on Louis Butler
- God's amendments
- Shark for the defense
- For an uproariously good time
- I like him just fine!
- Activist Young GOPers
- Give the guy some credit
- Atheist mom murders four children
- I love kiddy porn
- Why vote Democrat
- Equal time for Quatzequatl
- Cheneyge
- "Conservative" = "fascist"
- A reminder for the blog "Warrior"
- Revelation Nation
- Mitt Romney, President of Wyoming
- Other Side of His Dugout
- A number of people shouted 'Falafel!'
- Ralph
- H. Res. 888
- Raw anti-Psychic bigotry
- The blog Warrior
- Even I'm beginning to feel sorry for her
- The Iowa caucasians
- Esenberg completely alienates readership
- Jesus stays on as Huckabee advisor
-
▼
January
(45)
quid pro quo
- Andrew Golden
- Article V
- At The Tap
- bcb: P. Ryan Watch
- Big Political Cheese
- Billy Creek
- Bio-Fuel! a.k.a.
- Blogging Blue
- Blue Cheddar
- Blue Racine
- Boots & Kittens
- Brazen Maverick
- Brew City Brawler
- Brewtown Gumshoe
- Charlie Sykes
- Chief, The
- Cognitive Dissidence
- Complete Defeasance
- Crooks & Liars
- Dad29
- Daily Kos
- Dan Cody
- dane101.com
- Dustin Christopher
- Emily (the Other)
- Eye on Wisconsin
- Five Tomatoes
- folkbum's r&r
- Forward!
- GOP3
- Greg Laden
- Grothman, WTF?
- Haas414
- Happy Grumps
- Heartland Hollar
- Hearts & Minds
- Heraldblog
- Hermes' Journeys
- History Blog
- In Effect
- Jake's Funhouse
- James Rowen
- Jef Hall
- JIJAWM
- Jill Sixpack
- Kevin Binversie
- Lance Burri
- Lost Albatross
- M. Bouffant
- Michael Horne
- Milwaukee Rising
- MJS Edit Board
- MKE Federalists
- MKE News Buzz
- Mobile's Take
- Motley Cow
- Nick Schweitzer
- Nobody Asked ...
- One Wisconsin Now
- Perfect Impertinence
- Plaisted Writes
- Playground Politics
- Political Heat
- PrettyImportant.org
- Publius No. 9
- Pundit Nation
- Reasonable Progressive
- Rhymes With Clown
- Rock Netroots
- Sconz, The
- Sensenbrenner Watch
- Shark and Shepherd
- Sodom on the Lakes
- Sprawled Out
- Super Id
- TBogg
- The McPerfesser
- Thoughtful Conservative
- Tim Cuprisin
- TOSOMM
- Uppity Wisconsin
- Urban Milwaukee
- Walker's Point
- Watchdog MKE
- Water Blogged
- Waxing America
- Whallah!
- Wisconsin Vote
- WisOpinion
AP Top Political News At 12:03 a.m. EDT
lex americana
facetiae
- Roger Ailes
- alicubog
- BartCop
- Bush Watch
- Chase me, ladies
- Daily Howler
- D.C. Babylon
- Get Your War On
- Hendrik Hertzberg
- Hitchens
- Hullabaloo
- InDecision '08
- Instaputz
- Chris Kelly
- Landover Baptist
- Mencken
- Pandagon
- Pharyngula
- Private Eye
- Ralph
- Sadly, No!
- Sparkle Pony
- Spectator
- Tom Tomorrow
- The Toot
- Urban Dictionary
- James Wolcott
- Wonkette
7 comments:
First they came for 4chan
and I did not speak out
because I was not a /b/tard.
Then they came for the Scientologists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a brainwashed cultist.
Then they came for illusory tenant
and I did not speak out
because I was not a moonbat lawyer.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
The hell is a /b/tard?
Someone who posts to /b/ (random) at 4chan.
I can whip up at least a dozen horse's asses that are proud of using their name. I can also do it in one word.
Whallah!
I don't geddit.
Should there be a link to something or other that explains who said this about whom, over what?
I have nothing against Anonymouses, it's just funny when they berate people for not using their real life identities.
The comment thread is here, though, and it's entertaining for a number of other reasons.
Thanks. Now I see. But I wish I hadn't asked.
A stronger argument against the election of a judiciary it would be hard to make.
Post a Comment