tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post504287732508377399..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: Koschnick appeals to Scalia, but ...illusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-57445455656656901482009-02-26T12:19:00.000-06:002009-02-26T12:19:00.000-06:00"I caution you, his rhetoric does not match his co..."I caution you, his rhetoric does not match his conduct."<BR/><BR/>Reminds me of her warning against Justices Bradley, Wilcox, and Crooks.<BR/><BR/>"But do not be fooled. This is the majority opinion's story, not the facts and reasoning of the circuit court," Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. Marquardt, <A HREF="http://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28087#page=51" REL="nofollow">2007 WI 19</A> ΒΆ108Terrence Berreshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02867275234105879358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-57382248666521190862009-02-25T08:45:00.000-06:002009-02-25T08:45:00.000-06:00Strict Constructionist: "Congress shall make no l...Strict Constructionist: "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech" means just that.<BR/><BR/>Textualist: "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech" means Congress can regulate speech because, plain language be damned, the Crown regulated speech and so did our Founders (to an extent), so Congress clearly can regulate speech. <BR/><BR/>Koschnick: Never been this confused since the junior prom.Bretthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04647489967803458819noreply@blogger.com