tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post447717496763158688..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: WMC apologist quote of the weekillusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-49464366960541409322008-07-02T08:17:00.000-05:002008-07-02T08:17:00.000-05:00I hadn't, thanks.I hadn't, thanks.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-74372846312778657482008-07-01T21:56:00.000-05:002008-07-01T21:56:00.000-05:00IT,Have you seen the latest judicial activism from...IT,<BR/><BR/>Have you seen the latest judicial activism from WMC's allies on the Wisconsin Supreme Court?<BR/><BR/>Below v. Norton, was released today. Again, it's the conservative justices engaging in the activism. Today they overturned a century of Wisconsin case law and held that judge-made law barred claims of intentional fraud.<BR/> <BR/>I discuss the decision on my blog:<BR/><BR/>http://mysuperid.blogspot.com/2008/07/judicial-conservitism-what-fraud.html<BR/><BR/>Will WMC pay for another Esenberg video to praise Abrahamson's judicial conservatism in joining the dissent to Below, or are claims of judicial activism solely political?<BR/><BR/>Am I the only conservative that can see that our high court has been sold to WMC and the insurance companies? Boy, can't I wait to have Gableman's wisdom to guide our state.<BR/><BR/>Cheers,Scot1andhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05560353521307181651noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-87320971606498633292008-07-01T19:45:00.000-05:002008-07-01T19:45:00.000-05:00What is Lightbourn's position at this Think Tank? ...<I>What is Lightbourn's position at this Think Tank? Does he clean the filter?</I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.ucomparehealthcare.com/drs/michigan/urology/Lightbourn_George.html" REL="nofollow">Sort of</A>.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-91813229364538175612008-07-01T16:32:00.000-05:002008-07-01T16:32:00.000-05:00I idn't get real deep into George's screed. His m...I idn't get real deep into George's screed. His misrepresentation in the first graph of Faulkner's decision led into a tacit admission that WMC "orchestrated" Gableman's victory and then he just sort of went on a ramble.<BR/><BR/>What is Lightbourn's position at this Think Tank? Does he clean the filter now that Jess Bucher seems to have parted ways with all them other deep thinkers?grumpshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09641174443445494464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-14634676731137839172008-07-01T14:29:00.000-05:002008-07-01T14:29:00.000-05:00Judy Faulkner is one feisty ball of independenceHi...<I>Judy Faulkner is one <A HREF="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/feist" REL="nofollow">feisty</A> ball of independence</I><BR/><BR/>High praise coming from a cocksure bundle of <I>Ziegenpocken.</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com