tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post3403349850299363304..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: Meet Charlie Sykes's "fraudulent" petitionersillusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-1113519380897927012011-11-22T12:35:57.120-06:002011-11-22T12:35:57.120-06:00> ...Kamenick demanding the two young ladies re...> ...Kamenick demanding the two young ladies relinquish their right to privacy and assume the burden of production.<br /><br />Got that right. It's birther tactics, which are completely contrary to the presumed-innocent standard of our justice system. Or, as the Red Queen would say: First the sentence, and then the evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-69780614662653781502011-11-22T12:19:16.779-06:002011-11-22T12:19:16.779-06:00For those reasons alone Kamenick's demand is l...For those reasons alone Kamenick's demand is ludicrous.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-727236895512900862011-11-22T07:36:08.370-06:002011-11-22T07:36:08.370-06:00Given the harassment we know these women will bear...Given the harassment we know these women will bear by the people who wish to intimidate them, we have no interest-without their permission-of releasing the information to anyone outside of the press.<br /><br />The original sin here was meant to intimidate a class of people and the burden of proof is not on honest actors exercising their rights. Their persecutors must face a different standard.Graemehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07130230565295623805noreply@blogger.com