tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post8100065311921968404..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: Two things Judge Barbara Crabb never saidillusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-83159911054883562192010-08-06T17:29:39.272-05:002010-08-06T17:29:39.272-05:00The statute, yes. That's what I said.The statute, yes. That's what I said.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-10443482618759915742010-08-06T17:04:10.633-05:002010-08-06T17:04:10.633-05:00Your opening comments about what Judge Crabb never...Your opening comments about what Judge Crabb never said brings in question everything you have said. Please read the following from the official publication regarding this matter.<br /><br />IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT<br />FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN<br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -<br />FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC.,<br />ANNE NICOL GAYLOR, ANNIE LAURIE GAYLOR,<br />DAN BARKER, PAUL GAYLOR, PHYLLIS ROSE<br />and JILL DEAN, OPINION and ORDER<br />Plaintiffs,<br />08-cv-588-bbc<br />v.<br />President BARACK OBAMA and<br />White House Press Secretary ROBERT L. GIBBS,<br />Defendants.<br /><br />Entered this 15th day of April, 2010.<br />BY THE COURT:<br />/s/<br />BARBARA B. CRABB<br />District Judge<br /><br /><br />Page 64<br />"Although the law does not always point in the same direction on matters related to the<br />establishment clause, my review of that law requires a conclusion that 36 U.S.C. § 119 is<br />unconstitutional."<br /><br />Page 65<br /><br />2. It is DECLARED that 36 U.S.C. § 119 violates the establishment clause of the<br />First Amendment to the United States Constitution.<br /><br />Fair to say, I think, that she has gone on record stating that it violates the constitution and that it is in her opinion unconstitutional.Rick Brownnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-22740817949990808822010-05-04T14:55:41.110-05:002010-05-04T14:55:41.110-05:00Those defending the First Amendment are often thre...Those defending the First Amendment are often threatened with being shot by those defending the Second.<br /><br />"Sumo magis glandes!" says the choir director.Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.com