tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post4926889579185277720..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: Student editors need a law dictionaryillusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-56830813831054342962010-02-15T20:22:02.596-06:002010-02-15T20:22:02.596-06:00At least the meaning of that (possible typo) was c...At least the meaning of that (possible typo) was clear enough. (I see they've since deleted everything beyond and including the semicolon in the headline: <a href="http://thesconz.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/ouch-%E2%80%93%E2%80%93-herald-messes-up-on-legal-jargon/" rel="nofollow">Jack Craver</a> is a powerful media force.)illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-59874193157015678092010-02-15T20:13:35.997-06:002010-02-15T20:13:35.997-06:00How about the author referring to the justice &quo...How about the author referring to the justice "residing" over a case? I can forgive an undergrad for not understanding the procedural nuances of the court, but that's just ridiculous.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com