tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post4723574039428172026..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: Scott Walker's vote suppression bill delayedillusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-19540350660706127382011-05-19T10:38:50.574-05:002011-05-19T10:38:50.574-05:00*headdesk* I knew I shoulda said mug shot in their...*headdesk* I knew I shoulda said mug shot in their wallet.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-48360580909357283132011-05-19T10:34:37.340-05:002011-05-19T10:34:37.340-05:00For a while now, I've been wondering about a n...For a while now, I've been wondering about a name for a blog, if I ever decide to have a real one. It's posts <a href="http://fairlyconservative.com/2011/05/18/i-think-he-just-proved-my-point/" rel="nofollow">like this one</a> that make me think it should called "Follow The Logic".Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-73940808039226353622011-05-18T17:46:12.171-05:002011-05-18T17:46:12.171-05:00Question. Does the proposed legislation require t...Question. Does the proposed legislation require that your photo ID have your current address (i.e. an address in the ward in which you intend to cast your vote)? <br /><br />If so, then your argument about nobody being prosecuted for voting under a different name is somewhat off point. And, perhaps more importantly, the proposed legislation is much more insidious. Think about the number of people, students in particular, who move each calendar year.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-45928236978408136602011-05-18T09:41:40.240-05:002011-05-18T09:41:40.240-05:00I'm surprised they didn't include a provis...I'm surprised they didn't include a provision that voters must prove their adherence to the one true faith to placate Kleefisch and her minions.Other Sidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06475658453374184885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-16440338979784409522011-05-18T08:58:39.447-05:002011-05-18T08:58:39.447-05:00"and those who opposed having their photos ta..."and those who opposed having their photos taken for religious reasons [would be exempt from the law]"<br /><br />So Republicans can empathize with people who believe cameras steal one's soul, but not with someone whose boss won't let them take time off from their shitty job to get to the DMV.gnarlytrombonenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-21067300391654088212011-05-18T07:57:39.072-05:002011-05-18T07:57:39.072-05:00Und nichts.Und nichts.Other Sidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14772510064455770564noreply@blogger.com