tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post1237934862150629262..comments2023-10-28T08:02:44.565-05:00Comments on illusory tenant: So Scott Walker is being investigated for crimesillusory tenanthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-31914951146912464162012-05-28T10:26:52.284-05:002012-05-28T10:26:52.284-05:00Read the legislative history. Agent in 11.64 does ...Read the legislative history. Agent in 11.64 does not mean 'subordinate on a breakaway.' That would render the statute meaningless.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-12996045649291035112012-05-28T08:56:59.660-05:002012-05-28T08:56:59.660-05:00A subordinate can be an agent that still acts with...A subordinate can be an agent that still acts without his principal's authority. That's pretty basic. But, since you aren't licensed to practice law I suppose that may have slipped <i>your</i> mind.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-74622849630086339032012-05-27T12:56:09.315-05:002012-05-27T12:56:09.315-05:00No, I think the GAB specifically said the definiti...No, I think the GAB specifically said the definition of "agent" was to be construed as loosely as possible, "including fictional characters such as Jerry McGuire, or anyone else you want to defend with someone else's money."Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-10646824894107821192012-05-24T15:47:52.568-05:002012-05-24T15:47:52.568-05:00Thx Anon. They need to elevate the discussion.
I ...Thx Anon. They need to elevate the discussion.<br /><br /><i>I believe the GAB recently punted on the definition of "agent" ...</i><br /><br />Well it ain't Jerry Maguire.illusory tenanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524761974822871419noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-37638637472221718422012-05-24T08:00:45.903-05:002012-05-24T08:00:45.903-05:00I can't find a link at the moment, but I belie...I can't find a link at the moment, but I believe the GAB recently punted on the definition of "agent" as well, and have been offering "no comment" in connection with Barrett's demands for clarification.Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2506514005426983269.post-29255761249655957392012-05-24T07:18:33.382-05:002012-05-24T07:18:33.382-05:00Great post, illy. Keep 'em coming. You wont he...Great post, illy. Keep 'em coming. You wont hear a peep questioning Esenberg in the media here in Eau Claire. Heck.. the comment section on WEAU deletes any posts where I've mentioned Esenberg, MB & F, and/or Gableman.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com