The neglected bias in the Prop. 8 trial has instead to do with the fact that — as reported in The Los Angeles Times last month — Judge Walker "attends bar functions with a companion, a [presumably, male] physician."Via — where else — FoxNews.com. He's just sayin'.
It's easier than considering the actual opinion, I suppose.
eta:
Did anyone mention that Judge Vaughn Walker happens to be gay?
— McIlheran disciple
3 comments:
Of course Fox and the rest of the slimeballs would be nudging and winking just the same, if it had been a pro-hetero-only decision authored by a man who often attended bar functions with women.
Gay folk doing gay stuff is a biased special interest! Normal folk doing normal stuff is normal! And what's this Walker guy mean about negative attitudes towards queers?
The Fox News author doesn't explain -- if Judge Walker's personal interests are as much at stake as the author claims -- why Walker didn't jump at the chance to exercise his right to consent to marriage when he had the opportunity, before Prop. 8 reduced him to a morally disfavored citizen again.
He's a sleeper, you see.
Post a Comment